Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach to Selecting the Most Suitable Human Resources Software in Strategic Human Resources Management
Abstract views: 25
/ 
PDF downloads: 20
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17525148Anahtar Kelimeler:
Bulanık SWARA, Bulanık COPRAS, Bulanık EDAS, ÇKKV, İnsan Kaynakları YönetimiÖzet
Selecting software is a difficult MCDM problem with many conflicting criteria. With rapidly changing practices and organization needs, selecting human resources software is getting more complicated. Human resources management, whose main aim is to create value, plays an important role in creating sustainable competitive advantage. While Human resources professionals now have to contribute to the organization in the strategic roles, in recent years when digitalization is in our lives in every sense, it matters to implement human resources processes in the most effective ways. One of the aims of this study is to determine relevant evaluation criteria and to create an evaluation framework with integrated fuzzy MCDM methods by addressing the selection of the human resources software as a process. The other aim of the study is to make a contribution to the literature since the fuzzy SWARA method is not used in combination with fuzzy COPRAS and fuzzy EDAS methods in the selection of human resources software in the literature, and the resources related to the fuzzy SWARA method are limited.
Referanslar
Aksoy, E., Ömürbek, N., & Karaatlı, M. (2015). AHP Temelli MULTIMOORA ve COPRAS Yöntemi ile Türkiye Kömür İşletmeleri’nin Performans Değerlendirmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 33(4), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.17065/huiibf.10920
Ansari, Z. N., Kant, R., & Shankar, R. (2020). Evaluation and ranking of solutions to mitigate sustainable remanufacturing supply chain risks: a hybrid fuzzy SWARA-fuzzy COPRAS framework approach. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 13(6), 473–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2020.1758973
Bayraktar, E., & Efe, M. (2006). Kurumsal kaynak planlaması ERP ve yazılım seçim süreci. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi (15), 689-709.
Challa, J. S., Paul, A., Dada, Y., Nerella, V., Srivastava, P. R., & Singh, A. P. (2011). Integrated Software Quality Evaluation: A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Approach. Journal of Information Processing Systems, 7(3), 473–518. https://doi.org/10.3745/JIPS.2011.7.3.473
Chatterjee, N. & Bose, G. (2013). A COPRAS-F-based multi-criteria group decision making approach for site selection of wind farm. Decision Science Letters. 2. 1-10. 10.5267/j.dsl.2012.11.001.
Das, M., Sarkar, B. & Ray, S. (2012). A framework to measure relative performance of Indian technical institutions using integrated fuzzy AHP and COPRAS methodology. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences. 46. 230–241. 10.1016/j.seps.2011.12.001.
Ghorabaee, M.K., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E.K. & Antucheviciene, J. (2018). A new hybrid fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluation of construction equipment with sustainability considerations. Archiv.Civ.Mech.Eng 18, 32–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2017.04.011
Ighravwe, D. & Oke, S. (2019). An integrated approach of SWARA and fuzzy COPRAS for maintenance technicians’ selection factors ranking. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management. 10. 10.1007/s13198-019-00912-8.
Jadhav, Anil & Sonar, Rajendra. (2009). Evaluating and selecting software packages: A review. Information and Software Technology. 51. 555-563. 10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.003.
Karakaşoğlu-Kundakcı, N. & Işık, A. (2016). Integration of MACBETH and COPRAS methods to select air compressor for a textile company. Decision Science Letters. 5. 381-394. 10.5267/j.dsl.2016.2.003.
Keil, M. & Tiwana, A. (2006). Relative importance of evaluation criteria for enterprise systems: A conjoint study. Inf. Syst. J.. 16. 237-262. 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2006.00218.x.
Keršulienė, V., Zavadskas, E. & Turskis, Z. (2010). Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA). Journal of Business Economics and Management - J BUS ECON MANAG. 11. 10.3846/jbem.2010.12.
Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E., Amiri, M. & Turskis, Z. (2016). Extended EDAS Method for Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision-making: An Application to Supplier Selection. International Journal of Computers Communications & Control. 11. 358-371. 10.15837/ijccc.2016.3.2557.
Kiani-Mavi, R., Goh, M. & Zarbakhshnia, N. (2017). Sustainable third-party reverse logistic provider selection with fuzzy SWARA and fuzzy MOORA in plastic industry. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 91. 10.1007/s00170-016-9880-x.
Madenoğlu, F. (2019). Bulanık çok kriterli karar verme ortamında yeşil tedarikçi seçimi. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal. 7. 1850-1869. 10.15295/bmij.v7i4.1155.
Moniri, M., Alam T. A., Ayough, A. & Zandieh, M. (2020). Turnaround project risk assessment using hybrid fuzzy SWARA and EDAS method: case of upstream oil process industries in Iran. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology. ahead-of-print. 10.1108/JEDT-07-2020-0287.
Sadeghi, H. & Kazemi, F. (2019). Developing a new assessment fuzzy model by focusing on improving the reliability of customers’ individual verbal judgment (An Internet Banking case study). Consumer Behavior Studies Journal, 5(2), 55-82.
Stević, Ž., Vasiljević, M., Zavadskas, E., Sremac, S. & Turskis, Z. (2018). Selection of carpenter manufacturer using fuzzy EDAS method. Engineering Economics. 29. 281-290. 10.5755/j01.ee.29.3.16818.
Stević, Ž., Vasiljević, M., Puška, A., Tanackov, I., Junevičius, R. & Vesković, S. (2019). Evaluation of suppliers under uncertainty: A multiphase approach based on fuzzy ahp and fuzzy edas. Transport. 34. 52-66. 10.3846/transport.2019.7275.
Sumrit, D. (2020). Supplier selection for vendor-managed inventory in healthcare using fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach. Decision Science Letters. 9. 233-256. 10.5267/j.dsl.2019.10.002.
Ulutaş, A. (2019). University Website Performance Evaluation Using Fuzzy SWARA and WASPAS-F. Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Models for Website Evaluation (pp.151-165), IGI Global.
Ulutaş, A. (2020). Using of Fuzzy SWARA and Fuzzy ARAS Methods to Solve Supplier Selection Problem. Theoretical and Applied Mathematics in International Business.10.4018/978-1-5225-8458-2.ch008.
Yazdani, M. & Alidoosti, A. & Zavadskas, E. (2011). Risk Analysis of Critical Infrastructures Using Fuzzy Copras. Ekonomska Istrazivanja. 24. 27-40. 10.1080/1331677X.2011.11517478.
Yıldırım, B. F., & Timor, M. (2019). Bulanık ve Gri COPRAS Yöntemleri Kullanılarak Tedarikçi Seçim Modeli Geliştirilmesi. Optimum Ekonomi ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(2), 283-310. https://doi.org/10.17541/optimum.548505
Zarbakhshnia, N., Soleimani, H. & Ghaderi, H. (2018). Sustainable Third-Party Reverse Logistics Provider Evaluation and Selection Using Fuzzy SWARA and Developed Fuzzy COPRAS in the Presence of Risk Criteria. Applied Soft Computing. 65. 10.1016/j.asoc.2018.01.023.
İndir
Yayınlanmış
Nasıl Atıf Yapılır
Sayı
Bölüm
Lisans
Telif Hakkı (c) 2025 International Journal of Social and Humanities Sciences Research (JSHSR)
Bu çalışma Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ile lisanslanmıştır.
