Transformation in Sports Management: Journey to the Future with Holacracy
Abstract views: 57
/ 
PDF downloads: 20
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13147128Keywords:
Holacracy, Sports, ManagementAbstract
In this study, in addition to introducing the basic principles of holacracy, its advantages and disadvantages are evaluated by comparing it with traditional hierarchical structures in organizations. Additionally, focusing on how holacracy can be applied in the field of sports management, the potential implications of this model for sports organizations are discussed. The Holacracy model supports a participatory leadership approach, allowing employees to take more responsibility and take initiative. The advantages of holacracy include the ability to adapt quickly, the promotion of innovation, and more efficient management of business processes. However, this model also has disadvantages, in particular the need to deal with challenges such as increased uncertainty and complexity. The research reflects real-world applications of holacracy, supported by examples from organizations that have adopted this model. The applicability of holacracy to sports management is an important question mark given the fast-changing nature and complex structures of the sports industry. Especially in sports organizations, holacracy can be effective in performance management and focusing on strategic goals. In conclusion, the research highlights the strategic importance of the holacracy model on sports organizations and provides a guideline for understanding the potential of holacracy in the sport industry. However, it should be noted that studies on the applicability of holacracy in sport management are limited and its suitability to the specific needs of the sport industry has not been addressed in detail. Therefore, future research should focus more on the effectiveness of holacracy in sports management and conduct in-depth investigations on how this model can be adapted to the specific needs of sports organizations.
References
Anderson, C., & Brown, C. (2010). The functions and dysfunctions of hierarchy. Research in Organizational Behavior, 30, 55-89.
Avgerinou, V., Skoula, E., Papaioannou, A., & Kriemadis, T. (2017). Strategic planning in the sport sector. Choregia: Sport Management International Journal, 13(2), 35-52.
Beissel, A. (2011). Introduction to sport management: theory and practice. Sport Management Review, 14(4), 465-466.
Bhandari, R., & Colomo-Palacios, R. (2019, July). Holacracy in software development teams: a multivocal literature review. In 2019 19th International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications (ICCSA) (pp. 140-145). IEEE.
Biłyk, A. (2017). Holokracje–empowerment w organizacji. Edukacja ekonomistów i menedżerów, 43(1), 157-171.
Cassidy, T. (2010). Holism in sports coaching: Beyond humanistic psychology. International journal of sports science & coaching, 5(4), 439-501.
Chen, Y. T. (2017). On the Essential Characteristics of the Innovation Oriented Management Mode: Holacracy. In 3rd International Conference on Social, Education and Management Engineering (pp. 194-198).
Damon, Z. J., Leberman, S., Wells, J. E., Burton, L., Ferkins, L., Weese, J., & Peachey, J. W. (2022). Privileging practice in sport leadership: Applying relational reflexivity. Journal of Sport Management, 36(4), 394-407.
Farkhondeh, M., & Müller, B. (2021). Holacracy: A New Way of Organizing? Management Revue, 32(4), 302-317.
Golden, B., Pandey, A., & O’Rourke, J. S. (2017). Zappos: An experiment in holacracy. The Eugene D. Fanning Center for Business Communication, Mendoza College of Business, University of Notre Dame.
Krasulja, N., Radojević, I., & Janjušić, D. (2016, October). Holacracy-the new management system. In Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference, Njs, Serbia (Vol. 13).
Kukreja, J. (2019). Holacracy: The next generation leadership in a VUCA world. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development, 3(6), 37-47.
Kumar, S. & Mukherjee, S. (2018). Holacracy – the future of organizing? the case of zappos. Human Resource Management International Digest, 26(7), 12-15.
Kurt, S. (2019). Circle structure in holacratic organizations: An analysis of how to process tension into change. Digitalen Wandel gestalten: Transdisziplinäre Ansätze aus Wissenschaft und Wirtschaft, 49-59.
Lee, S. P. (2022). The Sports-Based Holistic Development Model: The General Public’s Transformation by Having a Meaningful Story Through Sport. SAGE Open, 12(4), 21582440221129164.
Liebert, F. (2020). Holacracy as a new approach to new product development in IT industry – case study. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology. Organization and Management Series.
Mack, D., & Szulanski, G. (2017). Opening up: How centralization affects participation and ınclusion in strategy making. Long Range Planning, 50, 385-396.
Mader, I. (2023). Wissen und Arbeit: Ausblick und Resümee. In Wissensmanagement erfolgreich umsetzen: Praxisleitfaden mit Self-Check, Toolselektionshilfe und Toolbox. ISO 9001: 2015 konform (165-174). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Mallett, C. J., & Rynne, S. B. (2010). Holism in sports coaching: Beyond humanistic psychology: A commentary. International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching, 5(4), 453-457.
Malloy, E., & Kavussanu, M. (2021). A comparison of authentic and transformational leadership in sport. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 51(7), 636-646.
Mosamim, P., & Ningrum, S. (2020). Holacracy and hierarchy concepts: Which one is more effective in an organizational leadership and management system?. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 5(12), 257-271.
Noori, N. A., & Tinaztepe, C. (2022). An exploratory research on holacracy: A new governance process for the organizations. Pearson Journal, 7(17), 101-119.
Ouche, O. M., Oima, D. O., & Oginda, M. (2016). Effect of strategic planning on annual income of National Sports Federations in Kenya. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 6(5), 41-64.
Perlak, J. & Krakowie, A. (2019). Selected management concepts supporting self-organizing teams. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology Organization and Management Series, 136, 471-481.
Rau, D., Hærem, T., & Fredericks, E. (2015). The influence of centralization and extent of cross-functional team usage on senior managers’ risk-related perceptions. Group & Organization Management, 40(5), 657-684.
Robertson, B. J. (2015). Holacracy: The revolutionary management system that abolishes hierarchy. Penguin UK.
Romme, A. (2019). Climbing up and down the hierarchy of accountability: implications for organization design. Journal of Organization Design, 8(1).
Savage, G., Franz, A., & Wasek, J. (2019). Holacratic engineering management and innovation. Engineering Management Journal, 31, 21-8.
Schellenberg, B., Verner-Filion, J., Gaudreau, P., & Chichekian, T. (2023). The quadripartite approach to passion in sport: A prospective and cross-domain analysis with intercollegiate student-athletes. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1-18.
Schell, S. & Bischof, N. (2021). Change the way of working, ways into self‐organization with the use of holacracy: an empirical investigation. European Management Review, 19(1), 123-137.
Schoemaker, P. J., Heaton, S., & Teece, D. (2018). Innovation, dynamic capabilities, and leadership. California Management Review, 61(1), 15-42.
Schwer, K., & Hitz, C. (2018). Designing organizational structure in the age of digitization. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research (JEECAR), 5(1), 11-11.
Shao, L., Luo, L., & Qi, H. X. (2014). Theoretical construction of sports information management and research on application system development. Advanced Materials Research, 926, 2759-2762.
Smolianov, P., & Zakus, D. H. (2006). Developing a global model of high-performance management in Olympic sports. In 14th congress of the European association for sport management, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Springer, S. (2014). Human geography without hierarchy. Progress in Human Geography, 38(3), 402-419.
Sroka, W. (2011). Trust and its impact on cooperation in alliance networks: Theory and practice. Risk in Contemporary Economy, 1, 214-219.
Staurowsky, E. (2001). Contemporary sport management. Journal of Sport Management, 15(2), 160-162.
Street, C., & Feeney, J. R. (2022). Turnover and Recommendation Intentions in the Post-Implementation Period of Radical Decentralization. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 22(1), 3-27.
Vega, R., Parastatidou, I. S., Ruíz-Barquín, R., & Szabo, A. (2016). Exercise addiction in athletes and leisure exercisers: The moderating role of passion. Journal of behavioral addictions, 5(2), 325-331.
Velinov, E. & Denisov, I. (2017). The relationship between contemporary holacratic models of management and company performance: evidence from global corporations in the world. Gatr Global Journal of Business Social Sciences Review, 5(2), 10-15.
Weinberg, R., & McDermott, M. (2002). A comparative analysis of sport and business organizations: Factors perceived critical for organizational success. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 14(4), 282-298.
Weirauch, L., Galliker, S., & Elfering, A. (2023). Holacracy, a modern form of organizational governance predictors for person-organization-fit and job satisfaction. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 1021545.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL HUMANITIES SCIENCES RESEARCH
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
