The Awareness Levels of Science Teachers Regarding Electromagnetic Pollution
Abstract views: 45 / PDF downloads: 33
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13880795Keywords:
Electromagnetic pollution, Awareness level, Science teachers, Environmental awareness, EducationAbstract
With the rapid advancement of technology today, electromagnetic fields (EMF) and electromagnetic pollution have become significant environmental and health issues. Since electronic devices are widely used in daily life, the potential health risks posed by electromagnetic pollution necessitate public awareness of this issue. The awareness levels of science teachers are especially critical in conveying accurate information to their students. The aim of this study is to determine the awareness levels of 141 science teachers working in the Etimesgut and Çankaya districts of Ankara regarding electromagnetic pollution and to examine the factors affecting these levels. A cross-sectional survey model was used in the study, and quantitative data were collected using Dalgıç's (2019) "Awareness Scale for Electromagnetic Pollution." The analyses revealed that science teachers in public schools have lower awareness levels compared to those in private schools; there was no significant difference between genders; however, teachers aged 22-25 had higher awareness levels compared to other age groups. These results can be explained by younger teachers being more attuned to technological developments and having more up-to-date information. Encouraging teachers to participate in professional development programs is important for increasing knowledge and awareness levels regarding electromagnetic pollution and other environmental issues.
References
Akgün, Ö. E., Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Demirel, F. & Karadeniz, Ş. (2011). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Pegem.
Bergqvist, U., & Vogel, E. (2004). Gender Differences in Perception and Awareness of Electromagnetic Fields. Bioelectromagnetics, 25(5), 370-374. DOI: 10.1002/bem.10191
Bütüner, Ü. O. & Sert, Ş. (2022). Düzce ilinde sigorta acentelerinin hizmet kalitesi üzerine bir araştırma. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 27(4), 523-546.
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Faktör analizi: Temel kavramlar ve ölçek geliştirmede kullanımı. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Modeli, 32, 470-483.
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2020). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Pegem Akademi.
Cevahir, E. (2020). SPSS ile Nicel Veri Analizi Rehberi. Kibele Yayınları.
Çakır, A. (2014). Faktör analizi [Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi], İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
Dalgıç, G. (2019). Öğretmen adaylarının elektromanyetik kirliliğe ilişkin farkındalık düzeylerinin çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi [Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi], Gazi Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
Ervural, B. Ç. (2020). Varyans Analizi (ANOVA) ve Kovaryans Analizi (ANCOVA) İle Deney Tasarımı: Bir Gıda İşletmesinin Tedarik Süresine Etki Eden Faktörlerin Belirlenmesi. BŞEÜ Fen Bilimleri Dergisi,7(2), 923-941.
George, D. & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: a simple guide and reference. Allyn & Bacon.
Karasar, N. (2016). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi. Nobel.
Kenar, İ., Turgut, S., & Gökalp, M. S. (2014). Determination of preservice teachers’ electromagnetic pollution awareness / Öğretmen adaylarının elektromanyetik kirlilik farkındalıklarının belirlenmesi. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, 10(4), 1077-1090. https://doi.org/10.17244/eku.62800
Kim, J.-H., & Choi, S.-W. (2010). Awareness of Electromagnetic Pollution in Public and Private School Students. Environmental Health Perspectives, 118(6), 768-772. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.0901231.
Köklü, N., Büyüköztürk, Ş. & Çokluk-Bökeoğlu, Ö. (2006). Sosyal bilimler için istatistik. Pegem A.
Seitz, H., Stinner, D., Eikmann, T., Herr, C., & Röösli, M. (2005). Awareness and Risk Perception of Electromagnetic Fields Among University Students. Journal of Radiological Protection, 25(3), 369-378. DOI: 10.1088/0952-4746/25/3/007
Simko, M., & Mattsson, M.-O. (2004). Electromagnetic Field Awareness Among Students in Different School Types. Bioelectromagnetics, 25(4), 316-321. DOI: 10.1002/bem.10175.
WHO (World Health Organization). (2016). Electromagnetic Fields and Public Health: Fact Sheet. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/electromagnetic-fields-and-public-health.
Wiedemann, P. M., & Schütz, H. (2005). Public Perception of Electromagnetic Fields and Wireless Technology: A Cross-Cultural Study. Risk Analysis, 25(5), 1123-1134. DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00663.x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL HUMANITIES SCIENCES RESEARCH
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.