An Unconscious Bias Affecting Decisions: Halo Effect in Referee Evaluations in Sports


Abstract views: 0 / PDF downloads: 0

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14028446

Keywords:

Halo effect, prejudice, sport, referee bias, referee evaluations

Abstract

This study was conducted to find out whether referees, who can also make subjective evaluations in individual or team sports competitions, are under the Halo effect in their evaluations of athlete performances according to some descriptive variables. The research group consisted of 247 referees selected by haphazard sampling method in various sports branches and different classifications for the year 2023. Personal information form and “Perceived Halo Effect Scale in Referee Evaluations in Sports” developed by İpin (2023) were used as data collection tools. In the analysis of the data, number, frequency and percentage analyses were used to determine the descriptive characteristics of the participants, and minimum-maximum levels, mean and standard deviation analyses were used to evaluate the scale scores. One-way analysis of variance and Independent groups T-test analysis were used to compare the scale with the descriptive characteristics of the referees. According to the findings, the mean of “overall Halo effect” of the referees participating in the study was found to be weak, the mean of “significant dimension effect” was found to be weak, the mean of “insufficient discrimination effect” was found to be very weak, and the mean of “general impression effect” was found to be weak. In addition, it was found that the referees' “general impression effect” scores differed significantly according to gender, their scores for each dimension differed significantly according to age, their scores for each dimension differed significantly according to education level, their “general impression effect” scores differed significantly according to refereeing level, their “general impression effect” scores differed significantly according to sports background, and their scores for all dimensions differed significantly according to refereeing branch. According to the results of the study, in general, it can be said that referees are not under the Halo effect when evaluating athletes. However, since there are some findings that indicate the existence of Halo effect among the results, more detailed research on the subject is needed.

References

Aiken, L. R. (2009). Psychological testing and assessment. Pearson Education India.

Allport, G. W. (1979). The nature of prejudice (25th anniversary edition). Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

Arsan, N. (2012). Buz pateninde hakem değerlendirmelerinin genellenebilirlik kuramı ve rasch modeli ile incelenmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Doktora Tezi, Ankara.

Ateş, G. (2020). Voleybol ligleri hakemlerinin düşünme stilleri. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Konya.

Atılgan, D., & Tükel, Y. (2019). Hakemlerin karar verme stillerinin incelenmesi. Sport Sciences, 14(2), 22-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.12739/NWSA.2019.14.2.2B0119

Bartlett, C. J. (1983). What's the difference between valid and invalid halo? Forcedchoice measurement without forcing a choice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(2), 218-226. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.68.2.218

Borman, W. C. (1975). Effects of instructions to avoid halo error on reliability and validity of performance evaluation ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(5), 556- 560. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.60.5.556

Cambridge Dictionary. (t.y.). Halo. in English dictionary. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/ english/halo

Cooper, W. H. (1981). Ubiquitous halo. Psychological Bulletin, 90(1), 218-244. https://doi.org/10.1037/ 0033-2909.90.2.218

Creswell, J. W. (2019). Eğitim araştırmaları (2. baskı) (Çeviri Editörü: Halil Ekşi). Limit Ofset.

Çelik, D. Ö. (2020). Farklı spor dallarında görev yapan hakemlerin karar verme stillerinin incelenmesi. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(4), 385-398. https://doi.org/10.31680/ gaunjss.776473

Dennis, I. (2007). Halo effects in grading students projects. Journal of Applied Pyschology, 92(4), 1169-1176. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1169

Dinçer, N. (2013). Spor yöneticilerinin karar verme stilleri ile problem çözme becerileri üzerine bir araştırma. Gazi Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Doktora Tezi, Ankara.

Durna, E. (1997). Türkiye’de futbol ve hakem. Yıldızlar Matbaacılık.

Eroğlu, S. Y. (2018). Hakemlerin ahlaki olgunluk ve empati düzeylerinin karar verme stillerine etkisinin incelenmesi. Kütahya Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Doktora Tezi, Kütahya.

Efe, M., Öztürk, F., & Koparan, Ş. (2008). Bursa ilindeki faal futbol hakemlerinin problem çözme ve atılganlık düzeylerinin belirlenmesi. Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi. 6(29), 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1501/Sporm_0000000092

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

Fisicaro, S. A., & Lance, C. E. (1990). Implications of three causal models for the measurement of halo error. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14(4), 419- 429. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 014662169001400407

Hickman, T. M., & Lawrence, K. E. (2010). The halo effect of goodwill sponsorship versus the pitchfork effect of supporting the enemy. Journal of Sponsorship, 3(3), 265-276.

Hotaman, D. (1995). Gülhane askeri tıp akademisi sağlık meslek yüksekokulu hemşirelik bölümü öğrencilerinin tutumları ile akademik başarıları arasındaki ilişki. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara.

İpin, Y. Ç. (2023). Sporda hakem değerlendirmelerinde algılanan halo etkisi: Bir ölçek geliştirme çalışması. Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Muğla.

Jurgensen, C. E. (1950). Intercorrelations in merit rating traits. Journal of Applied Psychology, 34, 240-243. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0062163

Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (2010). Günümüzde insan ve insanlar. Evrim Yayınları.

Karakoç-Alatlı, B. (2012). Başarının değerlendirilmesinde algılanan halo etkisi ölçeği’nin geliştirilmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara.

Karakuş, M. A. (2008). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin başarılarının değerlendirilmesinde hale etkisi. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara.

Kasap, H. (1997). Beden eğitimi. Morpa Spor Ansiklopedisi, 1, 156-160.

Kozlowski, S. W. J., Kirsch, M. P., & Chao, G. T. (1986). Job knowledge, ratee familitarity and halo error: An exploration. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(1), 45-49. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.1.45

Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Kirsch, M. P. (1987). The systematic distortion hypothesis, halo, and accuracy: An individual-level analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(2), 252-261. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.72.2.252

Lance, C. E., LaPointe, J. A., & Stewart, A. M. (1994). A test of the context dependency of three causal models of halo rater error. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(3), 332-340. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.3.332

Landy, D., & Sigall, H. (1974). Beauty is talent: Task evaluation as a function of the performer's physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29(3), 299-304. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036018

Landy, F. J., & Farr, J. L. (1980). Performance rating. Psychological Bulletin, 87(1), 72-107. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.87.1.72

Larose, H., & Standing, L. (1998). Does the halo effect occur in the elderly? Social Behavior and Personality, 26(2), 147-150. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.1998.26.2.147

Lucker, G. W., Beane, W. E., & Helmreich, R. L. (1981). The strength of the halo effect in physical attractiveness research. Journal of Psychology, 107, 69-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00223980.1981.9915206

Mandell, M. M. (1956). Supervisory characteristics and ratings: A summary of recent research. Personnel Psychology, 32, 435-440.

Miller, A. G. (1970). Role of physical attractiveness in impression formation. Psychonomic Science, 19(4), 241-243. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03328797

Morgan, C. T. (2015). Psikolojiye giriş (Ed. Sirel Karakaş ve Rükzan Eski) (22. Baskı). Eğitim Yayınevi.

Murphy, K. R., & Anhalt, R. L. (1992). Is halo error a property of the rater, ratees, or the specific behaviors observed? Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(4), 494–500. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.77.4.494

Murphy, K. R., Jako, R. A., & Anhalt, R. L. (1993). Nature and consequences of halo error: A critical analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(2), 218–225. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.218

Newcomb, T. M. (1931). An experiment designed to test the validity of rating technique. Journal of Educational Psychology, 22, 279-289. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0070737

Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(4), 250-256. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.35.4.250

Nufer, G., & Alesi, N. (2018). The halo effect in sports. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 9(2), 31-44. https://doi.org/10.30845/ijbss

Nufer, G. (2018). An exploration of the halo effect in professional soccer. European Journal of Physical Education and Sport Science, 4(9), 17-29. https://zenodo.org/records/1319077

Nufer, G. (2019). Say hello to halo: The halo effect in sports. Innovative Marketing, 15(3), 116-129. https://doi.org/10.21511/im.15(3).2019.09

Özdamar, K. (2003). Modern bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Kaan Kitabevi.

Özgüven, İ. E. (2007). Psikolojik testler. PDREM Yayınları.

Palmer, C. L., & Peterson, R. D. (2016). Halo effects and the attractiveness premium in perceptions of political expertise. American Politics Research, 44(2), 353– 382. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1532673X15600517

Pekcan, N. (2019). Algılanan halo etkisinin hiyerarşik doğrusal modelleme ile incelenmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara.

Pike, G. R. (1999). The constant error of the halo in educational outcomes research. Research in Higher Education, 40(1), 61-86. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018774311468

Rainey, D., & Hardy, L. (1999). Sources of stress, burnout and intention to terminate among rugby union referees. Journal of Sports Sciences, 17(10), 797-806. https://doi.org/10.1080/026404199365515

Rogers, E. P. (2005). Scale construction and halo effect in secondary student ratings of teacher performance. Brigham Young University Department of Instructional Psychology and Technology Doctoral Thesis, Canada.

Sapiro, D., & Tagiuri, R. (1959). Some effects of response inferring personality traits. Journal of Psychology, 47, 127-136.

Sarıdede, Ç., (2018). Voleybol hakemlerinin öz yeterlik düzeyleri ve karar verme becerilerinin incelenmesi. Gelişim Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul.

Sigall, H., & Ostrove, N. (1975). Beautiful but dangerous: Effects of offender attractiveness and nature of the crime on juridic judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(3), 410-414. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076472

Suveren, Y. (2022). Bilinçsiz önyargı: Tanımı ve önemi. Current Approaches in Psychiatry, 14(3), 414-426. https://doi.org/10.18863/pgy.1026607

Thorndike, E. L. (1920). A constant error on psychological rating. Journal of Applied Psychology, 4, 25-29. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0071663

Turgut, F. M. (1993). Eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme metotları (9. basım). Saydam Matbaacılık.

Ulutaş, H. (2021). Futbol hakemlerinin klasmanlarına göre psikolojik dayanıklılık ve karar verme stillerinin incelenmesi. On dokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Samsun.

Ünsal, A. (2005). Tribün cemaatinin öfkesi, ticarileşen Türkiye futbolunda şiddet. İletişim Yayınları.

Yavuz, E. (2022). Görünümü taklit eden markaların, orijinal marka imajına etkisi: Halo etkisi üzerine bir araştırma. Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul.

Published

2024-10-31

How to Cite

İpin, Y. Çağrı, & Ünal, H. (2024). An Unconscious Bias Affecting Decisions: Halo Effect in Referee Evaluations in Sports. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL HUMANITIES SCIENCES RESEARCH, 11(112), 2063–2075. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14028446