Hierarchy and Political Identity in the Design of Official Rooms


Abstract views: 184 / PDF downloads: 133

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10431464

Keywords:

Interior Architecture, Protocol, Decoration, Symbol, Policy

Abstract

Design is the reflection of various ideas. Throughout history, humans have used architecture and interior designs to retain and reflect power. People and societies reflected the message intended to be given and the hierarchical order desired to be created through interior designs, which created political identity. Space design is a strong tool for reflecting political and administrative identities. By examining the role of material infrastructures in the organization of power, the political aspect of design becomes substantial in terms of how power is formed and implemented. The ability of design to guide behavior, open design for the government, or the use of design by officials are the key points of the article. This article aims to analyse the impact of a designed interior on the experience of its users through hierarchy, politics and policy. While examining the concepts of status and hierarchy, the relationship of these concepts with space designs was emphasized, and by interpreting them with the design language, the role of space designs in creating political identity was revealed with examples. The interior features of executive rooms and their effects on perception were examined. Interior designs were interpreted with examples of selected office rooms. Even the most commonly designed interior spaces have an order in terms of a hierarchical order, and the potential importance of the relationships that influence their design and use is highlighted in this article.

References

Acar, H. (2018). Kamu Güvenliğinin Sağlanmasında Weberyen Bürokrasi ve Hiyerarşi Kavramı. International Journal of Management Economics and Business, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.17130/ijmeb.2018343117.

Akın, E. Y., & Hamamcı, C. T. D. (2007). Kentsel Gelişme ve Kentsel Rantlar: Ankara Örneği [Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi]. Ankara Üniversitesi.

Arslan, K., & Tokol, H. T. (2022). Harp ve Denizaltı Filo Bağlısı Gemilerde Yaşam Mahallerinin İç Mekân Tasarımını Etkileyen Kriterler: Askeri Hiyerarşik Sistem. Istanbul University, 2(1).

Beecher, M. A. (2015). The Political Interior. The Handbook of Interior Design, 46–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118532409.ch3

Birinci, N., & Birol, G. (2021). İyileştiren Hastane Yaklaşımı ve 21. Yüzyılın Sağlık Kampüslerine Yönelik Tasarım İlkeleri. Istanbul University, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.29130/dubited.1013994

Brooks, D. S. (2011). Political Decorating and Branding: A Historical Retrospective of the Oval Office Interiors from 1934 to 2010. Journal of Interior Design, 36(4), 1–18.

Çelikbilek, A. (2017). Modern Kentlerin Yaratılmış Güzellik Algısı: Türkiye’deki İnşaat Sektörünün Modernizm Pazarlaması Üzerine Bir İnceleme. Medeniyet Sanat Dergisi, 3(1), 79–103.

Churchill, W. S. (1944). Onwards to Victory: War Speeches by the Right Honorable Winston Churchill. Cassell, and Co.

Eriş, U. (2001). Çevrenin ve Mekanın İletişime Etkisi. Kurgu Anadolu Üniversitesi İletişim Bilimleri Fakültesi Uluslararası Hakemli İletişim Dergisi, 18(18), 311–324.

Göka, Ş. (2001). İnsan ve Mekan. Pınar Yayınları.

Hatipoğlu, D. (2020). Mimarlık ve Hukuk İlişkisi Bağlamında Ankara Adliyesi Balgat Ek Hizmet Binası Üzerine Notlar. Ankara Barosu Dergisi, 78(2), 135–172. https://doi.org/10.30915/abd.769374

İzgören, A. Ş. (2010). Dikkat Vücudunuz Konusuyor (48th ed., pp. 127–139). Elma Yayınevi.

Karaalioglu, S. (2020). Sergileme Tasarımlarında Tipografi Kullanımı. Fine Arts, 15(1), 44–51.

Kleinman, K., Merwood-Salisbury, J., & Weinthal, L. (2012). After taste: Expanded Practice in Interior Design (p. 79). Princeton Architectural Press.

Lefebvre, H. (2014). Mekanın üretimi (pp. 246–252). Sel Yayıncılık.

Markus, T. A. (2013). Buildings & power: freedom and control in the origin of modern building types. Routledge.

Miller, J. (2005). Furniture: World Styles from Classical to Contemporary. London Dorling Kindersley.

Mukerji, C. (1997). Territorial ambitions and the gardens of Versailles. Cambridge University Press.

Nielson, K. J. (2007). Interior textiles : fabrics, applications, & historical styles. John Wiley & Sons.

Oralgül, E. D. (2018). Charles Taylor’da Kimlik ve Siyaset İlişkisi. Kaygı (Bursa), 31, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.20981/kaygi.472770

Özdel, G. (2012). Foucault Bağlamında İktidarın Görünmezliği ve “Panaptikon” ile “İktidarın Gözü” Göstergeleri. The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication, 2(1), 22–29.

Özdemir, B., & Soysal Acar, A. Ş. (2004). Yaşama Farklı Bir Açıdan Bakış: Sol Elim. Sted Dergisi, 13(4), 131–133.

Picon, A. (2020). Architecture, Materiality, and Politics: Sensations, Symbols, Situations, and Decors. HAL (Le Centre Pour La Communication Scientifique Directe), 277–294. https://doi.org/10.5040/ 9781350103771.ch-015

Pile, J., & Gura, J. (2013). A history of interior design (p. 372). Wiley publishing.

Serulus, K. (2018). Design & politics: the public promotion of industrial design in postwar Belgium (1950-1986) (pp. 22–24). Leuven University Press.

Speer, A. (1970). Inside the Third Reich (R. Winston & C. Winston, Trans.; p. 103). The Macmillan Company.

Turan, N. (2006). İktidarı Simgeleyen İdari ve Törensel Bir Mekan Olarak Osmanlı Sarayı’nın Tasarımı. İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi Mecmuası, 56(1), 91–129.

Velibeyoğlu, V. R., & Göçer, A. E. (2018). Egemen İdeoloji ve Mimarlık: Helenistik ve Roma Dönemi Mimarisi Üzerinde “Egemen İdeoloji” nin Rolü. Anadolu Bil Meslek Yüksekokulu Dergisi, 13(50), 85–102.

Wallenstein, S.-O. (2019). Biyopolitika ve Modern Mimarlığın Ortaya Çıkışı (pp. 6–36). Lemis Yayıncılık.

Weinthal, L. (2012). Portfolio: Courtney Smith. In After Taste Expanded Practice in Interior Design. Princeton Architectural Press.

Yersel, A. (2015). Mekan ve İktidar İlişkisi Bağlamında “Makam Odaları” [Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi]. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi.

Yıldırım, B., Aytar Sever, İ., & Söğüt, M. A. (2022). Tasarım-Görsel Algı İlişkisinde Dijital Çağ Etkisi ve Psikolojik Yansımaları. Tasarım Mimarlık ve Mühendislik Dergisi, 2(3), 214–228.

Yıldırım, N. N. (2016). Mağaza İç Mekan Tasarım Bileşenleri. Sanat Yazıları, 0(35), 289–306.

Published

2023-12-25

How to Cite

Sönmez, D., & Demirarslan, D. (2023). Hierarchy and Political Identity in the Design of Official Rooms. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL HUMANITIES SCIENCES RESEARCH, 10(102), 3430–3448. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10431464