A Scale Development Study: Scale of Change Management Competencies


Abstract views: 202 / PDF downloads: 111

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10616524

Keywords:

Scale development, Change management, Change management competencies

Abstract

This research aims to develop a scale within the framework of Kotter’s 8-step-change management model for the understanding of change management competencies. For this purpose, scale items created by the literature review were presented to experts. The item was finalized based on the opinions of field experts and teachers. The created scale was applied to teachers who work under the Ministry of National Education in Konak, Buca, Bayraklı, and Gaziemir districts of İzmir. The data obtained were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). The scale was finalized with 27 items. Confirmatory Factor Analysis was conducted on the previously determined theoretical framework of the scale data. In the conducted analyses, the relationship between the entire scale and its sub-dimensions was examined, and it was observed that the factors were meaningfully related to each other. Through Confirmatory Factor Analysis, taking Kotter’s 8-step change model as the theoretical framework, a structure was formed from the sub-dimensions of ‘Creating a sense of urgency,’ ‘Establishing a change leadership committee,’ ‘Creating strategic vision and initiatives,’ ‘Establishing volunteer communities,’ ‘Removing barriers to the change process,’ ‘Identifying short-term wins,’ ‘Sustaining change momentum,’ and ‘Institutionalizing and making change Permanent.’ In this context, it was concluded that this structure is in harmony with each sub-dimension of the scale. It was determined that the fit indices of the model were within acceptable ranges. The internal consistency coefficient obtained for the entire scale was found to be .987. Thus, it is said to be a validscale whih contributes the literature.

References

Altunışık, R., Coşkun, R., Bayraktaroğlu, S. ve Yıldırım, E. (2004). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri. Sakarya Kitabevi.

Ash, J.(2000). Managing Change: Report on a Cornerstone Session at the 1999 AMIA Fall Symposium. J Am Med Inform Assoc., 7(2),115. https://doi.org/10.1136/jamia.2000.0070115.

Aslan, Ş. (2018). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri: Nicel, nitel ve karma tasarımlar için bir rehber. Eğitim Yayınevi

Brunsson, N. (2006). Administrative reform as routines. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 22(3), 243-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2006.10.007 .

Bullock, R. J., & Batten, D. (1985). It's just a phase we're going through: A review and synthesis of OD phase analysis. Group and Organization Management, 10(4), 383-412.

Cameroon, E., & Green, M. (2012). Making sense of change management. Kogan Page.

Can, N. (2002). Değişim sürecinde eğitim yönetimi. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 155-156.

Çelikten, M. (2001). Okul müdürlerinin değişim yönetimi becerileri. Eğitim ve Bilim, 26(119).

Çoban, Ö. (2016). Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı merkez teşkilatı yöneticilerinin örgütsel değişimi yönetme yeterlilikleri ile stratejik liderlik davranışları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. [Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi]. Gazi Üniversitesi.

Evans, M. (2004). Policy transfer in global perspective. Ashgate Ltd.

Field, A. (2009) Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. 3rd Edition. Sage Publications Ltd.

Güçlü, N., & Şehitoğlu, E. T. (2010). Örgütsel değişim yönetimi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Kazım Karabekir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi(13), 240-254.

Gültekin, S. (2017). Testlerde kullanılacak madde türleri, hazırlama ilkeleri ve puanlaması. Rahime Nükhet Çıkrıkçı Demirtaşlı (Editör), Eğitimde Ölçme ve Değerlendirme içinde (145-222). Anı Yayıncılık.

Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for

determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60.

Huerta Melchor, O. (2008). Managing change in OECD governments: An introductory framework. OECD Publishing.

Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review.

Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers. Harpers.

Nutt, P., & Backoff, R. (1993). Transforming public organizations with strategic management and strategic leadership. Journal of Management 19(2), 299-347. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639301900206.

OECD. (2009). Leading to learn: School leadership and management styles. Creating Effective Teaching and Learning Environments: First Results from TALIS içinde (189-217). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264068780-8-en.

Özdamar, K. (2004) Paket programlar ile istatistiksel veri analizi. Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayınları.

Özdemir, S. (2013). Eğitimde örgütsel yenileşme. Pegem A.

Peker, Ö. ve Aytürk, N. (2000). Etkili Yönetim Becerileri.Yargı Yayınları.

Simon, D., Kriston, L., Loh, A., Spies, C., Scheibler, F., Wills, C., & Härter, M. (2010). Confirmatory factor analysis and recommendations for improvement of the Autonomy-Preference-Index (API). Health Expectations: An International Journal of Public Participation in Health Care & Health Policy, 13(3), 234–243.

Şahin A. (2010). Örgüt kültürü-yönetim ilişkisi ve yönetsel etkinlik. Maliye Dergisi, 159, 21-35.

Şeker, H. ve Gençdoğan, B. (2006). Psikolojide ve eğitimde ölçme aracı geliştirme. Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.

Tatlıdil, H. (2002). Uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistiksel analiz. Ziraat Matbaacılık.

Tavşancıl, E. (2002). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi. Nobel.

Tezbaşaran, A. (2008). Likert tipi ölçek hazırlama kılavuzu. Mersin Üniversitesi.

Tekin, H. (2000). Eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme. Yargı Yayınları.

Yurdabakan İ, Çüm S. (2017). Scale Development in Behavioral Sciences (Based on Exploratory Factor Analysis). TJFMPC;11(2), 108-26. https://doi.org/10.21763/tjfmpc.317880.

Published

2024-01-31

How to Cite

Dağlı, İsmail Çağrı, & Şahin, S. (2024). A Scale Development Study: Scale of Change Management Competencies. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL HUMANITIES SCIENCES RESEARCH, 11(103), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10616524