Teacher Perceptions of Secondary School Principals' Transformational and Sustainability Leadership Styles
Abstract views: 125
/ 
PDF downloads: 108
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11432919Keywords:
Leadership, transformational, sustainerAbstract
Teacher perceptions of transformational and sustaining leadership styles of school administrators working in secondary schools and still continuing their duties constitute the basis of the subject of this research. This research was conducted by analyzing the answers given to the scales by teachers working in public secondary schools in the central districts of Denizli in the spring semester of the 2023-2024 academic year. The research is in a quantitative and survey model. Data were obtained from 326 teachers by random sampling. The highest average in teachers' perceptions of transformational and sustaining leadership styles is "Very high" and "It would make us happy to work with him." and “He speaks very optimistically about the future of the school.” in the articles. The lowest average is at the "Intermediate" level: "He doesn't move around the school much, he's usually in his office." It is in the article. In the sub-dimensions, it was determined that secondary school teachers thought that school principals exhibited transformational leadership styles more, while they thought that they exhibited sustaining leadership style at a moderate level. It has been determined that secondary school administrators' teachers' views on transformational and sustaining leadership methods do not vary in terms of age, branch and marital status, but they do vary depending on gender, seniority, education level and career status. Teacher opinions of secondary school administrators regarding transformational and sustaining leadership methods are higher in favor of male teachers in the sustaining leadership dimension and general leadership perceptions according to gender; It was observed that teachers with a faculty degree were higher than teachers with a master's degree in the transformational leadership dimension and general leadership perceptions according to their education level. According to their career status, the transformational leadership dimension was found to be higher between those with the title of teacher and those with the title of Head Teacher, and in favor of head teachers.
References
Allen, D. W. (1998). How nurses become leaders: Perceptions and beliefs about leadership development. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 28(9), 15-20.
Avolio, B. J. (1999). Full Leadership Development: Building the Vital Forces in Organizations. (Q. U. Julian Barling, & U. o. Kevin Kelloway, Dü) London: Sage Publications.
Avolio, B. J., & Yammarino, F. J. (2013). Transformational and charismatic leadership. The road ahead. Emerald Group Publishing, 257-280.
Aydın, M. (2007). Eğitim Yönetimi. Hatipoğlu.
Balay, R. (2000). Özel ve resmi liselerde yönetici ve öğretmenlerin örgütsel bağlılığı. Doktora Tezi, (94662), Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara üniversitesi.
Barbuto, J. E. (2005). Motivation and Transactional, Charismatic, and Transformational Leadership: A Test of Antecedents. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 11(4), 26-40.
Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational Leadership. New York: Psychology Press Taylor & Francis Group. (2nd ed.).
Bass, B. M. ve Avolio, B.J.: (1997), Transformational Leadership: A Response To Critiques. Academic Pres, New York, s.19-27.
Bass, B. M. and Steidlmeier P. (1999). Ethics, Character, and Authentic Transformational Leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 10 (2), 181-217.
Bass, B. M., Avolio, B. J., Jung, D. I., Berson, Y. (2003). Predicting Unit Performance by Assessing Transformational and Transactional Leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 207-218.
Bayar, Yılmaz . "Türkiye’deki Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı: Literatür Taraması". Siyaset, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi 7 / 1 (Ocak 2019): 123-142 .
Bennis, W., & Nanus, B. (1986). Leaders: The Strategies for Taking Charge. New York: Harper&Row.
Bono, J. E., Judge, T. A. (2004). Personality and Transformational and Transactional Leadership: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 901-910.
Burns, J. M.: (1978), Leadership, Harper and Row, New York.
Cascio, W. F. (1982). Applied Psychology in Personnel Managemen. USA: Reeston Publishing Company.(2nd ed.).
Colbert, A. E., Judge, T. A., Choi, D., & Wang, G. (2012). Assessing the trait theory of leadership using self and observer ratings of personality: The mediating role of contributions to group success,. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(4), 670-685.
Çelik, V. (1998). Eğitimde Dönüşümcü Liderlik. Eğitim Yönetimi. 4(16),423-442.
Çelik, V. (2000). Eğitimsel Liderlik. Pegem A Yayıncılık
Çelik, S. & Eryılmaz, F. (2006). Öğretmen Algılarına Göre Endüstri Meslek Lisesi Müdürlerinin Dönüşümcü Liderlik Düzeyleri (Ankara İli Örneği). Politeknik Dergisi. 9 (4),211-224.
Daresh, J. J. (2001). Supervision as Proactive Leadership. (3rd ed.), Waveland Press, Inc.
Encyclopedia.com. (2018). Charisma. Cengage/ Oxford University and Columbia University Press. https://www.encyclopedia.com/philosophy-and-religion/bible/biblegeneral/ charisma
Erdoğan, İ. (2003). Okul Yönetimi Öğretim Liderliği. Sistem Yayıncılık.
Eren, E. (2007). Örgütsel Davranış ve Yönetim Psikolojisi. Beta.
Gedikoğlu, T. (2005). Avrupa Birliği sürecinde Türk Eğitim Sistemi: Sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(1):66-80.
Graen, G. B., ve Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Development of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Theory of Leadership Over 25 Years: Applying a Multi-Level Multi-Domain Perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219-247.
Güçlü, N., Beycioğlu, K., Buluç, B., Kılınç, A. Ç., Doğan, S., Ertürk, A., . . . Koşar, S. (2021). Eğitim Yönetiminde Liderlik (7 b.). (N. Güçlü, & S. Koşar; Dü) Pegem.
Henman, L. D. (2011). Leadership: Theories and Controversies. Ел. публікація http://www. henmanperformancegroup. com/articles/Leadership-Theories. pdf.
Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1997). Situational leadership. In Dean’s Forum, 12(2), 1-8.
Horner, M. (1997). Leadership theory: past, present and future. Team Performance Management. An International Journal.3,270-285
Karasar, N.: (2017), Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi, 35. baskı, Ankara, Nobel Akademi Yayıncılık, s.1-368.
Koppang, A. F. (1996). Transformational and transactional leadership behaviors of administrators of performing and visual arts schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND, USA.
Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2007). The Leadership Challenge. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
McGregor, D. (1985). The Human Side of Enterprise: 25th Anniversary Printing. McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Northouse, P. G. (2007). Leadership: Theory and practice. (6th ed.), Sage.
Lambert, L. (2005). Leadership for Lasting Reform. Educational Leadership. 62(5).
Leithwood, K.A. (1992). The Move Toward Transformational Leadership. Educational Leadership. 49(5),8-12.
Leithwood, K. (1993). Contributions of Transformational Leadership to School Restructuring. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the University Council for Educational Administration. (Houston, TX, October 29–31, 1993). http://www.eric.ed.gov/ İndirilme Tarihi: 10 Mayıs 2006
Owen, H., Hodgson, V. ve Gazzard, N. (2011). Liderlik Elkitabı. Münevver Çelik (Çev.). Optimist.
Özalp, İ. & Öcal, H. (2000). Örgütlerde dönüştürücü (transformatıonal) liderlik yaklaşımı. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 3(4), 207-227.
Özdemir, M. (2018). Liderlik yönelimi ve politik beceri arasındaki ilişkinin okul müdürlerinin görüşlerine göre incelenmesi. Ege Eğitim Dergisi, 19(1), 116-134.
Pierce, J. L., & Newstrom, J. W. (2000). Leaders & the Leadership Process: Readings, self -assessments & Applications. (2nd Edition).
Rolls, J. (1995). The transformational leader: The wellspring of the learning organization. Learning organizations: Developing cultures for tomorrow’s workplace, 101-108.
Shakeshaft, C. (1989). Women in educational administration. (Updated Edition b.). USA: Sage Publication.
Şahin, S. (2004). Okul müdürlerinin dönüşümcü ve sürdürümcü liderlik stilleri ile okul kültürü arasındaki ilişkiler (İzmir ili örneği). Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 4(2), 365-395.
Töremen, F. ve Kolay, Y. (2003). İlköğretim okulu yöneticilerinin sahip olması gereken yeterlikler. Milli Egitim Dergisi, (160), http://www.yayim.meb.gov.tr/dergiler/160/toremen-kolay.htm (11.12.2003).
Ünal, Z. M.: (2019), Anlam İhtiyacı: Anlam İhtiyacı Temelinde Birey-İş Uyumunun Anlamlı İşin Alt-Boyutlarına Katkısı, Uluslararası Yonetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 15(1), s.157-180.
Yılmaz, K. (2004). Okul yöneticilerinin destekleyici liderlik davranışları ile okullardaki güven arasındaki ilişki konusunda ilköğretim okulu öğretmenlerinin görüşleri. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2004, 550
Yukl, G. (1994). Leadership in Organizations (3rd ed.). Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
Yukl, G. (1999). An Evaluative Essay on Current Conceptions of Effective Leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 33-48.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL HUMANITIES SCIENCES RESEARCH
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
