INVESTIGATION OF QUANTUM ORGANIZATION PERCEPTION OF EMPLOYEES


Abstract views: 42 / PDF downloads: 26

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26450/jshsr.1276

Keywords:

Quantum Organizations, Quantum, Chaos, Fractal, Leadership, Strategic Management

Abstract

Starting with the discovery of the telegraph and the establishment of railways, with the Organizational Big Bang, organizations
have grown structurally. Then, the widespread use of the internet and rapid technological developments, today; It has created
a high level of rapid life and created new problems in the workload, business planning, cooperation, procurement, logistics,
resource and energy use that cannot be solved by conventional methods. These problems that arise in the information age can
be solved only by moving to an organizational structure that is innovative, capable of attacking, competing, integrating with
the global economy. In this way, organizations that transform their structure: Quantum Organizations, we express.
The concept of quantum was first introduced in the 20th century. Today, it has spread to the field of social sciences. There are
very few studies on quantum organizations in the social sciences literature. They address quantum concepts and theory. One or
more studies measuring quantum organizational energy are also available in the literature. This is the first and pioneering study
that measures employees' perception of quantum organization. A new scale was developed for the study. The survey was
conducted on 500 key employees in Istanbul, Izmit and Bursa. According to the results of the research; the participants have
demonstrated that there is chaos in their organizations. When the organizational structures are analyzed; it was determined that
the organizations need for the quantum organization structure and management at a high level

Published

2019-07-31

How to Cite

MERT, G., & GÜNDOĞMUŞ, B. (2019). INVESTIGATION OF QUANTUM ORGANIZATION PERCEPTION OF EMPLOYEES. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL HUMANITIES SCIENCES RESEARCH, 6(39), 1734–1757. https://doi.org/10.26450/jshsr.1276